Kate Steinle has been laid to rest. She was the thirty-two
year old woman who was killed by the illegal immigrant in sanctuary city: San
Francisco. Francisco Sanchez, the illegal immigrant who murdered her, had been
deported five times and was a convicted felon. He should not have been walking
free on the streets of San Francisco. He should have been in prison, preferably
in one of the filthiest prisons in whatever banana republic he came from. But
the sanctuary city has this lawless policy of harboring ‘criminal aliens’ and
letting them run free within city limits to murder citizens who are minding
their own business and trying to live peaceful lives.
Obama pundits like Richard Fowler, a black man, glaze over
this white woman’s death by stating that ‘comprehensive immigration reform’
could have prevented her murder, for under comprehensive immigration reform,
there would be no need for a sanctuary city, which is where the alien had fled
to. It’s a clever spin to say that, so clever that Fowler couldn’t help smiling
while he made the statement on Fox News. Brand loyalty is more important to a
man like that than sympathy, honor, and respect. The deduction from his
statement would go like this: those who have blocked comprehensive immigration
reform are the ones who are responsible for Kate Steinle’s death. The truth is,
Obama’s comprehensive immigration plan would make every city a sanctuary city, and deaths by illegal aliens would
explode in number, and what happened in San Francisco at the hands of this
dirty illegal immigrant would be multiplied throughout the USA.
There is a question about this grave matter that no one but
me has thought of or that no one but me is assertive enough to ask. Here is the
question that I want an answer to: who did Kate Steinle vote for? Who did Kate
Steinle vote for in 2008? Who did Kate Steinle vote for in 2012? I am not going
to say that she deserved what she got if she voted for Obama. But I will say
that if she voted for him, she reaped what she sowed. True, if she and enough
other citizens had voted for John McCain in 2008 and Mitt Romney in 2012, the
illegal alien might have been in San Francisco in 2015 anyway, and she might
have been killed by him in the same fashion anyway. But by voting for Obama,
the crime that became Kate Steinle’s fate had the best chance of all of coming
to pass.
This woman was pretty and white and happy and fun. White
lives matter. She is not alive today because it was her time to die and because
God had numbered her days to go no farther than they did. That’s all true. But
it’s also true that it is the present Administration’s fault that she is not
alive. Sanchez is the murderer; Obama and his Marxist crew are the enablers.
Sanchez should already have been hung on the gallows for what he did. Everyone
who wants a stern immigration system in place that would prevent illegal aliens
from entering the country and committing dastardly deeds ought to use this case
as much as they can: to further the cause against illegal immigration, and to
further the cause of alien deportation.
But back to this question: who did Kate Steinle vote for? It
matters either way. If she did not vote for Obama, then she reaped what others
have sown, which is an argument for conservatives to push harder for laws
against illegal immigration to be executed in full force. If she voted for
Obama, then she reaped what she was guilty herself of sowing, which is an
argument for some conservative change in the liberal camp. Kate Steinle was
killed by a random bullet by an illegal alien. It’s the kind of death that can
happen to anyone at any time virtually anywhere in America, especially in a sanctuary
city like San Francisco, which is the sort of place that is most popular with
liberal democrats who follow President Hussein Obama just as drones do their
imperial bee.
You people who vote with blind regularity for liberal,
socialist, Marxist candidates whose purpose it is to ‘fundamentally transform’
the nation into something your ancestors would not recognize nor want to live
in, listen up. “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man
soweth, that shall he also reap” (Galatians 6.7.) This verse has a deeper
meaning than my application of it here. But my application is still legitimate,
and here it is: when you sow bad politics, don’t be surprised if you reap
rotten rewards. You might reap small or you might reap large. But you will reap
in some way at some time because of who you voted for. You could lose your job.
You could lose your self-respect. You could lose your life.
This has been a Puritanical opinion on the death of Kate
Steinle and the question that we should all be asking: who did she vote for?
No comments:
Post a Comment