Canada’s CBC is funded by Canadian taxpayers. The bill is a huge one: $1.4 billion dollars per year. If there are 40 million Canadian citizens, this means that each citizen pays $35.00 a year for CBC content. It is impossible, though, for any fair, righteous, or decent person to get his thirty-five dollars’ worth because the CBC is not only unfair, unrighteous, and indecent, it has gotten increasingly hateful towards Canada’s white citizens, its white families, and especially its white men: the patriarchs. This hatred, moreover, is malicious towards all citizens because the agenda pushing the hatred is for causing divisions among ethnic groups, religions, sects, and genders. This makes the CBC worse than worthless. It makes it destructive content that we are made to pay for.
As recently as twenty some years ago, say the year 2000, hosts at the CBC spoke favorably of the Candu Reactor, Canada’s nuclear power plant technology, and they did this regularly, which baffled me. Then, all of a sudden, there was no more mention of it. What does this mean? For a long time, obviously, there had been a top-down order to sing the praises of nuclear power; then the order was reversed, and the choir went silent. Nuclear power is not something that a CBC host would take it upon himself or herself to talk about. It is the kind of thing that a host is ordered to talk about. CBC hosts don’t decide what news they will report. The ‘news’ they report is whatever they are told to read. They are not journalists or even reporters. They are mindless repeaters of narratives. If you listen to CBC Radio, for example, from Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Halifax, and you do this consecutively, you will notice, if you pay attention, that the narrative is the same all down the line, all the way from coast to coast. This would not be the case if CBC hosts were allowed to actually report the news. Some hosts, for example, would question the Liberal narrative concerning feminism, global warming, gun rights, Islam, residential schools, gay marriage, transgenderism, or Covid-19. This would happen even though practically every CBC host is a socialist because even socialists voice disagreement if they are allowed to do so.
CBC programs, too, are written in stone for their hosts. Just like what happens at the news desks, programs must conform to the commandments even to the point of breaking none. ‘Thou shalt kill the Candu Reactor’ means to never mention that thing again; and if you are ever told to voice the narrative on it, you’d better stick to it being good or bad just like it has been decided from on high at CBC headquarters. That’s the interpretation of that commandment. I know it just as if I had been on the CBC Mount on the day that the commandment was given. I know it just as if I had been convinced of the holiness of the command by the sight of a burning bush. CBC hosts have certain liberties of speech and conduct accorded to them during their prosecution of programs. These liberties are not very wide, only about as wide as the gutter behind a cow. They are much deeper than they are wide, though, about as deep as if the gutter went down to hell by way of a bottomless pit. The perimeter of narrative-talk is a small space; the griminess of said talk, that has no bottom. For example, no matter how frequently the narratives of sexism, racism, and the manifold phobias are discussed, these discussions amount only to a wee bit of width compared to what could be discussed; but the defamations that attend sexism, racism, and the sundry phobias—these may be as endless for depth as the most biblical abysses. The characters that are sketched are circumscribed; the corrupting of characters is unconstrained. In other words, you may talk about white men and boys, or even of colonists, conservatives, and Christians; but when you do you’d better dig down deep to find some dung to fling.
The CBC radio programs that were at least sort of good were discontinued about a couple of decades ago. (It is now 2025 as I write this.) The rest were contaminated by radical narratives. So over the years, due to their propaganda, hatred, and poisoned content, the CBC programs that I listened to fell one by one into disuse. The only one that I listen to now, and probably the last one that I will listen to with regularity, is a French one called, ‘Aujourd’hui L’histoire.’ It is biased, of course; but I listen to it in order to retain my French and because its content is historical. I don’t give it undivided attention; it’s not worth that kind of honor; so I listen while shaving, doing the laundry, or when engaged in some other boring task. And while I listen, I criticize and mock. This makes the show almost tolerable. So when I listen, I watch for two things: how many grunts the host will do, and how many times the word ‘effectivement’ will be uttered. The grunting may be noticed in the current host, the former host, and even the man who fills in. These two characteristics of the show are pathetic but entertaining. I used to count the grunts and the number of times ‘effectivement’ occurred, episode by episode. But after awhile that got pedantic and made me feel eccentric.
CBC radio reporting is fake content; often it is fake even in the way it is delivered. A host will pretend to interview a guest about something; but you can tell that they both are trying hard to make it seem like they’re not reading what they say. Sometimes I turn on the CBC at random just to see how fake it still is. I did this, for example, on June 12, 2021, and found the CBC show called, ‘The Debaters.’ What do you talk about when you are not allowed to debate important matters like the open border in Quebec or the Covid hype? On this day they debated whether ice cream should be consumed in a cone or in a cup. Then they debated trampolines versus swimming pools. Later that same day I landed in the middle of a program about taking a ‘body positive journey,’ by which was meant having the courage to liberate your body by exposing your arms and thighs, no matter how fat they are. Is it not worth thirty-five bucks to hear essential debating like that?
I make fun of nonsense like CBC content because the people responsible for it need to be shamed. Fools, however, which is what CBC hosts and their allies are, who and what do they mock? They mock the righteous and righteousness. “Fools make a mock at sin: but among the righteous there is favour” (Proverbs 14.9) CBC personnel need to be ashamed; they need to feel their sins; they need to be fired; they need to repent; they need forgiveness; they need to do something good for society for a change.
No comments:
Post a Comment